Re: LDAPEXT status and last calls

[howes@netscape.com (Tim Howes)]

Mark C Smith wrote:
> 
> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> 
> > Though most of draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-01.txt is okay,
> > I believe there are still a number of outstanding issues that
> > must be discussed and resolved before last call should be made.
> > I believe the draft will require significant revision before it
> > can be progressed as a proposed standard.  I do not believe a WG
> > last call should be made on this draft at this time.
> 
> I more or less agree.  I had planned one more revision before last call.  If
> the comments and open issues can be addressed to everyone's satisfaction
> during and after last call without another last call being needed, then I
> have no problem with the current draft being in last call.  I defer to the WG
> chairs to decide what is the best procedure to use.

Let's use the last call to movitate us to get these
issues addressed. Depending on the scope of the revisions,
we can decide whether another last call is needed. Mark,
can you come to Orlando prepared to give us an update
on the status of the draft.               -- Tim