Re: LDAPv2 with draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-01

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

David Boreham writes:
>Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> 
>> Anyway, general and safe translation between T.61 (in LDAPv2) and
>> UTF-8 is impossible because the client may not know the attribute
>> types of all the attributes, and binary attributes should not be
>> translated.
> 
> Did anyone actually use T.61 ?

Yes, when accessing X.500(1988) which uses T.61.
That was the original purpose of LDAP, after all.

-- 
Hallvard