[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP ACLs

To: "Alan Lloyd" <Alan.Lloyd@OpenDirectory.com.au>
Subject: Re: LDAP ACLs
From: "Paul Leach" <paulle@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:35:25 -0700
Cc: <ietf-ldapext@netscape.com>
Delivered-to: ldapext-archive@critical-angle.com
Resent-date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"MZB-r.0.kB7._vLIr"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

- -----Original Message-----
From: Alan Lloyd <Alan.Lloyd@OpenDirectory.com.au>
Date: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 8:45 PM

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Leach [SMTP:paulle@microsoft.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 1998 7:41 AM
>> 
>> Neither a standardized replication protocol nor standardized ACLs
are
>> absolutely needed for white pages applications.
> Can I disagree here - and no doubt thousands of others would too. 
> eg. why is there so many copies of the white pages on this
>planet and why are the master copies protected.

It is not required that the ACLs be administered via LDAP for the
white pages data to be protected. So your comment is a total
non-sequitor.


- ----------------------------------
Paul J. Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
PGP Key ID: 0x978829DD
Fingerprint: 9EFA A405 39B4 F91F DE6F 8939 6FE9 F5D8
Key Servers: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 ldap://certserver.pgp.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 5.5.5

iQCVAwUBNUlfHcqlCdSXiCndAQHV8QP9EH2rLp4bP3xMILU+UifYaC+TdHsPmBF5
gsqCevbmkWuBCAqFXmZGendvr8Tjwom25LmbPzBMgkmPm/qWn9JLwL+F0UAI5GC0
kEaiKd2VUOnbQl54NDbZ1NeKBux2KAAvlkJStOgHg4+0FiFqXqiWplAUAVIprn0f
YNU/L+JDr9g=
=bGkc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Prev by Date: RE: Naming of ACLs, Replication etc
Next by Date: RE: LDAP ACLs
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread