[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP ACLs

Paul Leach writes in response to Prasanta

>>I thought we agreed @ LA to move forward with one standard format.
>
>Since Ed said he didn't understand my proposal, that means that for at
>least one person, the LA agreement was based on a misunderstanding.
>and hence may not have really been agreement.

My memory of the event was that when Tim asked how many people favored
a single model he got about 70 hands, and when he asked how many favored
multiple models he got 2.

Are we currently at 69 - 3, or at 69 - 2 with one "not sure" :-)

Seriously, there seemed to be quite strong feeling expressed by the audience
that a single model was the preferred way forward.  I guess what I'd like to
see is some comment to the list by those who have been observing this dialog
about whether or not re-opening the issue is a good use of our resources.

--bob

Bob Blakley
IBM Lead Security Architect
Voice: +1 (512) 838-8133
Fax:    +1 (512) 838-0156
Post:    11400 Burnet Road, Mail Stop 9134, Austin, TX 78758 USA
Internet: blakley@us.ibm.com