[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: LDAP ACLs
This ones got my vote!
regards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Leach [SMTP:paulle@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 1998 4:58 AM
> To: prasanta@netscape.com
> Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
> Subject: Re: LDAP ACLs
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasanta Behera <prasanta@netscape.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 11:45 AM
>
>
> >
> >
> >Paul Leach wrote:
> >
> >> 2. However, there might be several different kinds of ACL formats,
> >> for different servers. Each format would have an OID associated
> with
> >> it.
> >
> >This will not be a god idea. If we have n formats,
> >
> >1) the a server has to support all the formats which will be
> expensive
> >to manage.
>
> I explicitly said that each server supports exactly one format.
>
> >2) The admin has to understand all the formats. If one wants to one
> ACL,
> >the the
> > admin hads to modify all of them.
>
> The above sentence does not parse. I don't understand what you are
> saying.
>
> [snip]
>
> >I thought we agreed @ LA to move forward with one standard format.
>
> Since Ed said he didn't understand my proposal, that means that for at
> least one person, the LA agreement was based on a misunderstanding.
> and hence may not have really been agreement.
>
>
> - ---------------------
> Paul J. Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
> PGP Key ID: 0x978829DD
> Fingerprint: 9EFA A405 39B4 F91F DE6F 8939 6FE9 F5D8
> Key Servers: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 ldap://certserver.pgp.com
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 5.5.5
>
> iQCVAwUBNUd4I8qlCdSXiCndAQEpZwP+M3ks2W2k4Jm2BaYE6OOtRpW5sAuiP3nk
> I9S3y5Lj3oYgLUtUFqXFKBNMB391sNFuICMgUtRiKy6mjTfZeNina9N8Jwm6Sl0p
> JSbSyDRPlWnEsGVsljwpHWvYqBCJq8pwMMdZ2C4N7SVIbNEKSaTLNpwJsGfzQIlP
> BXFxK6oPWoI=
> =6eUT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>