[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: LDAP ACLs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- -----Original Message-----
From: Prasanta Behera <prasanta@netscape.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 11:45 AM
>
>
>Paul Leach wrote:
>
>> 2. However, there might be several different kinds of ACL formats,
>> for different servers. Each format would have an OID associated
with
>> it.
>
>This will not be a god idea. If we have n formats,
>
>1) the a server has to support all the formats which will be
expensive
>to manage.
I explicitly said that each server supports exactly one format.
>2) The admin has to understand all the formats. If one wants to one
ACL,
>the the
> admin hads to modify all of them.
The above sentence does not parse. I don't understand what you are
saying.
[snip]
>I thought we agreed @ LA to move forward with one standard format.
Since Ed said he didn't understand my proposal, that means that for at
least one person, the LA agreement was based on a misunderstanding.
and hence may not have really been agreement.
- ---------------------
Paul J. Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
PGP Key ID: 0x978829DD
Fingerprint: 9EFA A405 39B4 F91F DE6F 8939 6FE9 F5D8
Key Servers: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 ldap://certserver.pgp.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 5.5.5
iQCVAwUBNUd4I8qlCdSXiCndAQEpZwP+M3ks2W2k4Jm2BaYE6OOtRpW5sAuiP3nk
I9S3y5Lj3oYgLUtUFqXFKBNMB391sNFuICMgUtRiKy6mjTfZeNina9N8Jwm6Sl0p
JSbSyDRPlWnEsGVsljwpHWvYqBCJq8pwMMdZ2C4N7SVIbNEKSaTLNpwJsGfzQIlP
BXFxK6oPWoI=
=6eUT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----