[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: RFC 2251 considered harmful
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Allen [SMTP:rja@smmpk17.Eng.Sun.COM]
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 1998 7:29 AM
> To: ed.oskiewicz@bt-sys.bt.co.uk; S.Kille@isode.com
> Cc: m.wahl@critical-angle.com; howes@netscape.com;
> ietf-ldapext@netscape.com; ietf-asid@netscape.com
> Subject: Re: RFC 2251 considered harmful
>
>
> >>This is an interesting point.
>
> So, um, what exactly is the solution to using referrals in a
> protocol that allows servers in the chain to not support
> critical extensions?
>
> It seems that the safest thing for a client to do is use
> LDAP v2. :-(.
>
V2 into X.500 or DAP and X.500 or a mixture :-))
> Robert Allen
> rja@sun.com