Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ?

[dwall@quintcom.com]

This doesn't sound correct to me.  For one thing, this is a search query
result, so the number of elements in the response should be fixed and
therefore the array does not need to expand.  Next, if/when a C++/Java
version comes out of these APIs, they could certainly use a vector which
would give the same performance as an array and still allow it to be
dynamically grown.  Lastly, when Mark Smith says something, it is probably
correct since he is a parent of LDAP!  ;-)

David






Ian Bruce <ian@iexist.flw.lucent.com> on 02/24/98 01:33:06 PM

Please respond to ianbruce@lucent.com