IETF-LDAPext Chronological Index (199802)

[Thread Index] [Top]
Last update: Thu Jul 31 22:01:22 2014
109 messages in chronological order

Subject
From
# of followups

LDAP testing at Sun's Connectathon 98 Audrey Van Belleghem 0
About Authentication methods for LDAP Ludovic Poitou - Sun Micro 1
Re: About Authentication methods for LDAP Mark Wahl 1
Re: About Authentication methods for LDAP Ludovic Poitou - Sun Micro 1
dynamic LDAP Manyi Lu 0
announcing E-CARM, a new mailing list Judie Mulholland 0
Re: About Authentication methods for LDAP Chris Newman 0
draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-reqts-00.txt Ellen Stokes 0
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-reqts-00.txt Internet-Drafts 0
Access Control document Alan Lloyd 1
Re: Access Control document Steve Kille 1
Re: Access Control document David Boreham 2
Re: Access Control document M.Pohlman 1
Re: Access Control document David Chadwick 0
RE: Access Control document Chris Weider 1
Re: Access Control document David J Woolley 1
RE: Access Control document Alan Lloyd 0
Re: Access Control document Rich Ankney 1
RE: Access Control document Alan Lloyd 0
RE: Access Control document Alan Lloyd 0
Re: Access Control document David Boreham 0
Re: Access Control document Steve Kille 0
Re: Access Control document David J Woolley 0
Re: Access Control document Rich Ankney 0
RE: Access Control document David Chadwick 0
RE: Access Control document Chris Weider 1
Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-dynamic-07.txt Tim Howes 0
LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldap-cache-01 Mark Wahl 0
RE: Access Control document David Chadwick 0
minor comments on caching draft Mark Wahl 1
Access Control and LDAP schema Alan Lloyd 0
Re: minor comments on caching draft Tim Howes 0
LDAP service name Chris Newman 1
I am on vacation till 02-20 Sanjay Jain 0
Re: LDAP service name Luke Howard 0
Important Message Online . Services 0
Important Message Online . Services 0
FREE (Directory) X.500 DAP/LDAPV3 Application Client Stack Sour ce Code Alan Lloyd 0
test - please ignore Alan Lloyd 0
Re: LDAP service name John Myers 0
CEN/ISSS/WS-DIR Erik Andersen 0
Comments on last call for simple caching scheme Steve Kille 1
Re: Comments on last call for simple caching scheme Tim Howes 0
Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Hallvard B Furuseth 1
LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-lang-00.txt Tim Howes 1
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapext-hobs-01.txt Internet-Drafts 0
LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Mark Wahl 1
I am on vacation till 02-20 Sanjay Jain 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Mark Smith 1
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Ian Bruce 2
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Jochen Keutel 1
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Hallvard B Furuseth 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Hallvard B Furuseth 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? dwall 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Hallvard B Furuseth 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? MALCOLM BOFF 2
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Christopher Lakey 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Ian Bruce 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Ed Oskiewicz 0
Missing text in ldap-c-api-00 Hallvard B Furuseth 0
ldap-c-api: malloced vs. "ldap alloced" data Hallvard B Furuseth 1
Re: ldap-c-api: malloced vs. "ldap alloced" data Tim Howes 1
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Vinay Shankar 0
Re: ldap-c-api: malloced vs. "ldap alloced" data Hallvard B Furuseth 0
RE: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Marcelo Lang 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Ed Oskiewicz 1
Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-lang-00.txt Steve Kille 1
RE: ldap-c-api: malloced vs. "ldap alloced" data Salter, Thomas A 1
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Bruce Greenblatt 0
Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Frank Dawson 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Dave Paulsen 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Ed Oskiewicz 0
Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-lang-00.txt Tim Howes 1
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt marcus . lasance 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Peter Whittaker 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Peter Whittaker 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt Chris Weider 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Hallvard B Furuseth 2
more ldap-c-api problems Hallvard B Furuseth 0
Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-lang-00.txt Steve Kille 1
RE: ldap-c-api: malloced vs. "ldap alloced" data Hallvard B Furuseth 1
RE: ldap-c-api: malloced vs. "ldap alloced" data Hallvard B Furuseth 0
Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt) Steve Kille 0
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt David Chadwick 0
(Fwd) Fwd and comments on IETF "Use of Language Codes in LDAP" David Chadwick 0
RFC 2251 considered harmful Ed Oskiewicz 1
Re: RFC 2251 considered harmful Steve Kille 1
Re: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt) David Boreham 1
RE: more ldap-c-api problems Salter, Thomas A 0
Re: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt) Steve Kille 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Ian Bruce 0
RE: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-s implepaged-02.txt) Salter, Thomas A 0
RE: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-s implepaged-02.txt) Chris Weider 1
RE: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-s implepaged-02.txt) Anil Srivastava 0
Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-lang-00.txt Tim Howes 1
RE: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-lang-00.txt Salter, Thomas A 0
Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-lang-00.txt Steve Kille 0
Re: RFC 2251 considered harmful Robert Allen 0
RE: RFC 2251 considered harmful Steven Judd 0
Re: RFC 2251 considered harmful David Boreham 0
RE: RFC 2251 considered harmful Alan Lloyd 0
RE: RFC 2251 considered harmful Alan Lloyd 0
RE: RFC 2251 considered harmful Alan Lloyd 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Hallvard B Furuseth 0
Re: Scrolling vs Paging (Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-simplepaged-02.txt) David Boreham 0
Re: RFC 2251 considered harmful Leif Johansson 0
[no subject] Unknown 0
[no subject] Unknown 0
Re: Why ldap_<first,next>_attribute ? Unknown 0


[Thread Index] [Top]