Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Kurt Zeilenga writes:I would think that the choice is open at the moment. If you have some suggestions (in either category), now would be a good time to mention them.
Amongst other factors in determining whether to approve this BOF,
they will need to be convinced that there is sufficient level of
participation in the BOF and the proposed WG.
I'd participate in the WG's mailinglist and hopefully some WG meeting, but probably not this BOF.
One question about the WG charter: Stick to features with existing
implementations, or consider significant new invention, or leave
that choice open?