[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [ldapext] Fwd: Call for interop proposals
- To: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
- Subject: Re: [ldapext] Fwd: Call for interop proposals
- From: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:20:00 -0800
- Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org, LDAP Extensions list <ldapext@ietf.org>
- In-reply-to: <FBEC9E24-C367-44DD-8806-A2D946F8A46E@isode.com>
- References: <6929B465-1C9E-47FD-8D6C-1D65E23448EA@commerce.net> <BA85B16E-7EB6-4D64-8D28-13C76A60746D@Isode.com> <478BA103.9040106@novell.com> <012C9995-E26E-411D-BDA4-01DC88EA2716@Isode.com> <5EAD3F57-8589-4173-BA65-BC635A9BBF67@sun.com> <FBEC9E24-C367-44DD-8806-A2D946F8A46E@isode.com>
On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
I can bring the Isode M-Vault (server) and Sodium Sync (client). I
suspect having OpenLDAP there will not be a problem. Will check to
see if Apache DS can be there. Others are, of course, quite
welcomed.
I chatted with Chris and Lisa today regarding their plans. At
present, there are no plans on doing any interop testing at IETF#71.
They said that if we wanted to do some, they would try to find us a
room. Given the short notice, I'm thinking it better to shoot for
something at IETF#72 (Dublin) instead. However, if there was strong
interest in doing this at IETF#71, I'm willing to make things happen
(one way or the other).
I note that I will likely be submitting a LDAP BoF proposal for
IETF#72 to do work in both updating existing RFCs detailing LDAP
extensions as well as work on new extensions. (Please drop me a
private note if interested in co-chairing the BoF and/or the WG (if
approved). I prefer NOT to chair the WG myself.)
-- Kurt