[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [ldapext] Fwd: Call for interop proposals
Michael,
I thought I was on the JNDI interest list but I didn't see your message
about JNDI and RFC 4370. I've been looking at using proxy authz
using JNDI, how does it fall short? I haven't tried it yet but I'd love
to know what you've experienced.
Thanks,
Tom
>>> Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> 01/15/08 11:20 AM >>>
Jaimon Jose wrote:
> We do have test suites defined by opengroup which most of the directory
> vendors follow. Would that be sufficient? or should we define new test
> suites as part of this exercise?
Would be interesting to test some things which have rather draft status
like draft- zeilenga- ldap- relax- 02.txt (together with a user interface)
or non- OpenLDAP syncrepl implementations (RFC 4533) if they exist.
Do the test suites of opengroup also cover proxy authorization? E.g.
JNDI falls short following RFC 4370 and there hasn't any response to my
inquiry on the JNDI- INTEREST mailing list. Ah, well...
How about testing over Internet? Less social fun but also less traveling.
Ciao, Michael.
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext