[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: protocol: Result codes no longer reserved for API
As LDAPBIS co-chair, I see no need for any WG chair action at
this late stage (the I-D is approved for publication) to make
any changes to the I-D based upon your comments.
The removal of this ASN.1 comment is not substantive change to
the LDAP technical specification, nor in anyway, impacts which
codes are or are not reserved for APIs.
Since the publication of BCP 64, the definitive list of
(registered) LDAP result codes is managed by IANA. The
ASN.1 comment is, at best, an extraneous comment and, at worse,
an erroneous comment. Additional codes have been reserved for
As the removal of the comment is not a substantive change, it's
lack of mention in Appendix C is appropriate.
>BTW, C.1 also does not note that strongAuthRequired was renamed to