|
Thanks for your review. I really appreciate the assistance.
> >>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 11/8/2005 7:49:16 am >>>
> Sorry to be so late... > > >3.1.2. Client Certificate > > If a client that has provided a suitable certificate subsequently > > performs a Bind operation using the SASL EXTERNAL authentication > > mechanism (section 5.2.1), information in the certificate may > > be used by the server to identify and authenticate the client. > > Why was "may subsequently be used" changed to "may be used" here? I removed the phrase because it was redundant. The "subsequently" part was already in the first part of the sentence, so the 2nd subsequently wasn't necessary.
> > 3.1.3.1. Comparison of DNS Names > > That is, the subject > > *.example.com matches the server names a.example.com and > > b.example.com but not the server name example.com. > > This example lost one case since authmeth-16. I suggest: > > > That is, the subject > > *.example.com matches the server name a.example.com, but not > > the server names example.com and b.a.example.com. Thanks. Good catch. The sentence now reads:
"That is, the subject *.example.com matches the server names a.example.com and b.example.com but does not match example.com or a.b.example.com."
Roger
|