|
Hallvard Furuseth writes:
> Roger Harrison writes:
> > and it isn't meant to exhaustively enumerate the issues with > > DIGEST-MD5 semantics relative to LDAP such as the method used to > > generate a hash value. > > No, I was only suggesting s/will fail/may fail/ at this time. > Or "can fail". A long explanation for a short word:-) Perhaps I'm not very imaginative, but how could the authentication succeed if there isn't a match according to SASL DIGEST-MD5 semantics? Can you give me at least a possible example? If so, I'll gladly s/will fail/may fail/. If not, I think I'd prefer to leave it as "will fail."
>
> -- > Hallvard |