[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Fwd: Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol - controls
Jim Sermersheim wrote:
I don't. What I'm saying is there was a message from Howard which seemed
to me to raise these two issues (a and b). Relaxing what "appropriate"
means doesn't address either of these issues. Maybe I'm wrong and the
only issue raised was that we want "appropriate for the operation" to
mean more than specified as appropriate for the operation by the control
spec. No response is needed though, I'm too tired of this issue to argue
anymore, no one else is concerned. I'll make the change.
Since the Last Call just went out for draft 30, I just wanted to check
the status of this change.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support