[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: acknowledgements and copyright
At 12:58 PM 3/25/2005, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Should [Syntaxes] & [Schema] include X.500 in
>Acknowledgements? Maybe [Protocol] and [Roadmap] too.
>[Models] does. The other drafts don't seem to need to.
I think not. The [Models] document is based on the
X.501(93) document. Other LDAPBIS I-Ds may well be
based ideas expressed in X.500 documents, but they
are not based on X.500 documents (at least not in
the same way and/or degree [Models] is).
>I'm wondering how the copyright notices work. The drafts'
>copyright notices say Copyright ... <just one year>. Yet
>copyright notices I see in software tend to have a list of
>years, right back to when the code was first written.
Different strokes for different folks.
The IETF has its stoke, see applicable BCPs (78/79).
Kurt