|
It seems consensus is to go ahead with the name change unless anyone else can substantiate harm in doing so.
Jim
>>> Mark Smith <mcs@pearlcrescent.com> 12/10/04 7:33:37 AM >>> Michael Ströder wrote: > > Are you aware that this could lead to a name change in various existing > LDAP client APIs? > > Therefore I'm against such a name change although the name change would > make the meaning more clear. I think most API implementations would keep the old name around (at least for a while) and also support the new name. Or is that a problem for some API implementations? There is some benefit to changing the name in the protocol (minor though it is). -Mark |