[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: protocol: strongAuthRequired
Michael Ströder wrote:
Are you aware that this could lead to a name change in various existing
LDAP client APIs?
Therefore I'm against such a name change although the name change would
make the meaning more clear.
I think most API implementations would keep the old name around (at
least for a while) and also support the new name. Or is that a problem
for some API implementations? There is some benefit to changing the
name in the protocol (minor though it is).
-Mark