Re: protocol: closing SASL upon Unbind

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

I wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>> The SASL mechanism itself may provide a layer closure facility
>> and, if so, it should be used.
> 
> If so, [SASL] should be modified to mention such a facility: The
> application shouldn't need to know that the particilar SASL layer it is
> using has such a facility; the SASL implementation itself should provide
> a "close the current layer" function.

Sorry, I meant "close the current layer if necessary", or "attempt to
close the current layer", or something like that.

-- 
Hallvard