[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [schema] groupofNames and groupofuniquenames

At 11:38 PM 9/19/2004, Vithalprasad Gaitonde wrote:
>Both these classes define member (and uniqueMember) as MUST attrs (same
>as X.521).
>This means that a group without members cannot exist.

Correct.

>This seems like a limitation in certain situations

Likely.

>Any suggestions ? comments ?

Define some new 'group' schema elements.  Suggest such be
discussed on the ldapext mailing list as such is beyond
our scope.

Kurt