[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: [schema] groupofNames and groupofuniquenames
At 11:38 PM 9/19/2004, Vithalprasad Gaitonde wrote:
>Both these classes define member (and uniqueMember) as MUST attrs (same
>This means that a group without members cannot exist.
>This seems like a limitation in certain situations
>Any suggestions ? comments ?
Define some new 'group' schema elements. Suggest such be
discussed on the ldapext mailing list as such is beyond