[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: NOT filter question



Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>At 09:49 AM 9/2/2004, John McMeeking wrote:
>>Is this something that should be clarified in the LDAP standards?
> 
> IMO, yes.  We should make it clear in [Protocol] that AVA evaluation
> is a specified in X.501(1993), providing a summary of these
> semantics.

Do X.500/LDAP servers stay with 1993 semantics when accessed through
LDAP?  If not, a warning to client implementors and maybe an example
might be in order.  E.g. using (!(&(player=cn=Ron)(player=*))) instead
of (!(player=cn=Ron)), unless I've missed something.

-- 
Hallvard