Re: current control combination proposals

[Chris Ridd <chris.ridd@isode.com>]

On 17/5/04 8:03 am, Ramsay, Ron <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com> wrote:

> No, not "so far".
> 
> If LDAP is to remain aligned with, or at least interoperable with, X.500, then
> constraintViolation has to remain an update problem.
> 
> Ron

Of course since X.500 doesn't really have controls like LDAPv3, there's no
real possibility of having incompatible controls in X.500. Using
constraintViolation to report incompatible LDAP control permutations
wouldn't break interworking.

It would be much nicer of course if result codes were somehow extensible,
but that's another problem altogether :-)

Cheers,

Chris