[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: SUBCLASSING, again
I would have no trouble deleting the sentence from Models, section
" Auxiliary object classes cannot subclass structural object
However, I do not believe that the intent to permit Auxiliary object
classes to subclass Structural object classes is as clear in X.501.
To fix the original problem, Models, section 2.4.3, third paragraph,
second sentence needs to be deleted, too. It begins:
"If no DIT content rule ..."
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> X.501 doesn't explicitly say that auxiliary classes cannot
> not subclass structural classes. By your argument, these
> must be allowed as well. Why aren't you making this argument?