|
Looks good to me. >>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> 1/8/04 3:54:50 PM >>> Though I think you might have misunderstand some of my points, I likely some of yours, and that we're not exactly seeing eye to eye on the "why", I think we've converging on acceptable replacement text. Here is my latest offering: - guidance as to what value the sender should provide for the criticality field (note: the processing semantics of the criticality field, which are defined above, should not be altered in any way by the control's specification), Comments? Kurt |