[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: [schema] vs. rfc2247 replacement
At 02:14 AM 12/11/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>[schema] section 1.1 says:
>> Section 3.4 of
>> this document supercedes the technical specification for the 'dc'
>> attribute type found in RFC 2247.[editor's note: Substitute
>> replacement RFC at time of publication.] The remainder of RFC 2247
>> remains in force.
>Is rfc2247 being revised (with a "replacement RFC")? And the
>replacement will still define 'dc'? If so, it sounds like we should
>come to an agreement with them about which document is authorative for
>'dc'. In particular if [schema] gets published before the rfc2247
At this point, any revision of RFC 2247 will come after [Schema]
is published. When 2247 revision does come, it should only update
the remainder (or portion of).
The [schema] text above should be consistent with the state
of LDAP standard track documents at the time of its publication.
If one simply ignores the note, it is. I suggest the note be
deleted when [schema] is next revised.