[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

filter-05 comments



In section 5 (LDAP Search Filter Definition), the Filter and
SubstringFilter definitions do not match those in [Protocol].

In section 6 (String Search Filter Definition), "section 1.3
(Common ABNF Productions) of [Models]" should be section 1.4.

Section 7 (Examples):

This paragraph seems to have been garbled:

>   The third example illustrates the use of the ":dn" notation to
>   indicate that matching rule "2.4.6.8.10" should be used when making
>   comparisons,

No, the ":2.4.6.8.10" notation indicates that.

>   and that the attributes of an entry's distinguished name
>   should be considered part of the entry when evaluating the match.

Finally,

>   The sixth and final example demonstrates assertion of a BER encoded
>   value.

How?  It's no different from the fourth example, except for the
numericoid.  Does a numericoid in a string filter indicate BER?
If so, the document should say so.

-- 
Hallvard