[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP based on X.500 '93 (was: New text for X.501)

To: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Subject: Re: LDAP based on X.500 '93 (was: New text for X.501)
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:10:25 -0800
Cc: LDAP BIS <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <3F9CB7DB.1050107@stroeder.com>
References: <3F9BBB94.BBE78984@salford.ac.uk> <3F9CB7DB.1050107@stroeder.com>

At 10:14 PM 10/26/2003, Michael Ströder wrote:
>David Chadwick wrote:
>>The defect report can only address the 1997 and 2001 versions of X.500,
>>since the 1993 version that LDAP is based in is no longer supported by
>>ITU-T/ISO.
>
>Is it possible to update the X.500 version LDAP is based on
>within LDAPbis work items?

As previously discussed, since LDAP was not designed for newer
versions of X.500, no, the references cannot be simply updated.
We'd have to detail which of changes to X.500 were applicable
and which were not.  This would get quite messy.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAP based on X.500 '93 (was: New text for X.501)
  - From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk>

References:
- New text for X.501
  - From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk>
- LDAP based on X.500 '93 (was: New text for X.501)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: LDAP based on X.500 '93 (was: New text for X.501)
Next by Date: Re: LDAP based on X.500 '93 (was: New text for X.501)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread