[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Fwd: [ldapext] modifyDN.deleteOldRDN and name forms
A few editorial corrections to my post...
At 05:50 PM 6/19/2003, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>>It appears that X.501 allows name forms to specify attributes that are
>>not allowed by the object class definition that the name form is used
>Not the "structural" distinction made in the following quote.
>><from Name form definition> "The RDN attribute (or attributes) need
>>be chosen from the list of permitted attributes of the structural
>>class as specified in its structural or alias object class
>I take this means that the RDN may be chosen from the other
>attributes which are allowed to appear in the entry, such as
>those allowed (directly or indirectly) by a DIT Content Rule.
>>a) Does this also apply to DITContentRules? Meaning, if an attribute
>>not allowed on the object class definition, or allowed by the DIT
>>Content Rule, can it be specified in the name form?
>No. The naming attributes must be listed from the attributes of the
>entry and those attributes must be allowed either the structural
>object class of the entry or by the controlling DIT content rule.
>>I can't find answers to a, b, or c, in the X.500 series.
>I think the answer is primarily given in X.501.