[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt

To: steven.legg@adacel.com.au
Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 18:07:03 +0200
Cc: Norbert Klasen <norbert+lists.ietf-ldapbis@burgundy.dyndns.org>, <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <HBF.20030508tjt0@bombur.uio.no>
References: <100842373.1052259660@[10.10.9.3]> <004c01c3144d$c08c66d0$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au> <HBF.20030508tjt0@bombur.uio.no>

I wrote:
>Steven Legg writes:
>> 
>> The assertion syntax for facsimileNumberMatch is TelephoneNumber,
>> i.e. SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 .
>> The assertion syntax for facsimileNumberSubstringsMatch is
>> SubstringAssertion,
>> i.e. SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 .
> 
> The '$' separators in fax-numbers are just treated as plain characters
> when matching?

Hold on.  According to the Syntaxes draft, TelephoneNumber is a
PrintableString, and PrintableString doesn't allow '$'.  Me not
understand...

-- 
Hallvard

Follow-Ups:
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt
  - From: Norbert Klasen <norbert+lists.ietf-ldapbis@burgundy.dyndns.org>

References:
- I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt
  - From: Norbert Klasen <norbert+lists.ietf-ldapbis@burgundy.dyndns.org>
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt
  - From: "Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt
Next by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-klasen-ldap-facs-tel-number-matching-00.txt
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread