[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Models: DIT Content Rules and AUX object classes

At 02:02 PM 2/12/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>>> If so, I suggest it is added that e.g. "AUX 1.1" can be used to say
>>> 'no auxiliary objectclasses are allowed'.
>> 
>> That would be an extension to the existing schema model
>> and hence beyond scope of this document.
>
>Well, I only wanted that if 'no AUX' meant 'all aux classes allowed'.

In re-examining this issue, I think it might be appropriate
to add to Section 2.4.3.

   The DIT content rule associated with the structural object
   class of the entry controls which auxiliary classes the
   entry may belong to.

Kurt