Re: Summary of [Models] issues from WG Last Call

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
> Please let the WG know (within the next few days) if I've missed
> any issue

This one.  Couldn't find it in the archive:

>From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
>Message-Id: <HBF.20030210tnvk@bombur.uio.no>
>Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:29:26 +0100
>Subject: Re: Models: Detail with Object Class Definitions
> 
>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>>At 02:42 PM 1/30/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>>> I suggest the following addition to [Models] 4.1.1 (Object
>>> Class Definitions):
>>>
>>> "Note that the MUST and MAY lists may be modified by DIT
>>> Content Rules (see 4.1.6)."
>> 
>> I think that might actually lead to confusion as one might
>> think that the DIT content rule is "modifying" the object
>> class definition.  
> 
> True.  How about
> 
>    "Note that which attributes MAY and MUST be present in an
>    entry is also affected by DIT Content Rules (see 4.1.6)."

-- 
Hallvard