[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: subschema semantics (Was: Models: Schema references to undefined entities)
At 01:28 PM 2/12/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> Clients SHOULD NOT assume that server supports all published or
> referenced elements of a particular definition.
How about dropping the 4.2 addition suggestion (I
made in the summary (item 11) and instead add the
following to 4.4?
Clients SHOULD NOT assume a published subschema is
complete nor assume the server supports all schema
elements it publishes.