Re: Continuation reference to root DN

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

Jim Sermersheim writes:
> After re-reading this thread, I can find no clarifications that need to
> be made in the protocol document. I do remember someone (Kurt?) at the
> last meeting commenting on one item that could be clarified--it escapes
> me at the moment though.

Someone in this thred (I or Kurt?) did mention to explicitly forbid
continuation references to the root DN.

4.5.3 (Continuation References in the Search Result):

   "The <dn> part MUST be present"

(which Kurt mentioned could mean a present but empty DN)

-> "The <dn> part MUST NOT be empty"

-- 
Hallvard