[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Failed or Abandoned Bind operations

To: Jim Sermersheim <jimse@novell.com>
Subject: Re: Failed or Abandoned Bind operations
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:52:16 +0100
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <sddca3cd.075@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>
References: <sddca3cd.075@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>

> The latter (if they wish to determine) =97 will try to make it more =
> obvious.

Good.  (BTW, could "determine" be replaced with "have" or have I missed
some nuance?  I like simple words.)

> Also, what the client really needs to do (in order to determine) is
> either make use of the BindResponse, and if no BindResponse is
> recieved, must rebind.

Or unbind, or send/receive a TLS closure alert.  [authmeth] 5.2.2 states
that the latter leaves the connection in an anonymous state.

-- 
Hallvard

Prev by Date: Re: Continuation reference to root DN
Next by Date: TLS closure alert and auth/authz ID
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread