Re: issues with full schema support (was: short names, in general (Re: Comment ..)

[Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>]

Timothy Hahn wrote:

> Add
> to the problem the "feature" that depending on the area of the "tree"
> you're "in", the schema to use may be different.  At this point, "client"
> code throws in the towel.

Add to the problem that sub schema sub entry also might be subject to 
access control => cached sub schema sub entry data must be tied to a 
bind DN.

Ciao, Michael.