[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Bind and StrongAuthRequired

To: Peter Bachman <peterb@cequs.com>
Subject: Re: Bind and StrongAuthRequired
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:06:05 -0700
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <20020726161650.57344274.peterb@cequs.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020726090911.03559818@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20020726090911.03559818@127.0.0.1>

At 01:16 PM 2002-07-26, Peter Bachman wrote:
>The necessity to invoke strongAuthRequired seems to come into play in the following
>wording:
>
>- strongAuthRequired: The server has detected that an established
>     underlying security association protecting communication between
>     the client and server has unexpectedly failed or been compromised.

This paragraph specifies the meaning of the strongAuthRequired
result code when returned in a Notice of Disconnect.  I don't
see how it comes into play of use of the strongAuthRequired
result code when returned in a Bind response.

Kurt

References:
- Bind and StrongAuthRequired
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: Bind and StrongAuthRequired
  - From: Peter Bachman <peterb@cequs.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bind and StrongAuthRequired
Next by Date: authmeth (Was: Bind and StrongAuthRequired)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread