[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Abandon Modify

To: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>
Subject: RE: Abandon Modify
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 19:56:16 -0700
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <A7E3A4B51615D511BCB6009027D0D18C056384E2@aspams01.ca.com>

At 05:42 PM 2002-07-09, Ramsay, Ron wrote:
>My suggestion was
>that all update operations should always be confirmed, which would require
>the 'abandoned' error code.

Obviously there are no implementations which return this
yet-to-be-defined result code.  I don't see how we can
possible adopt your proposal.

We can only consider changes which are supported by
multiple independently-developed interoperable implementations.

We also cannot add new protocol elements to the technical
specification.

Kurt

References:
- RE: Abandon Modify
  - From: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Abandon Modify
Next by Date: RE: Abandon Modify
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread