Re: LDAPv2 -> Historic I-D

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

At 11:00 AM 2001-11-06, Michael Ströder wrote:
>"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>> 
>> I've updated draft-zeilenga-ldapv2-01.txt based upon comments.
>> This revision recommends that not only RFC 1777, RFC 1778,
>> and RFC 1779 be moved to Historic (as discussed during LDAPbis
>> @ IETF#52), but RFC 2559 and 2589 as well (due to their dependency
>> upon LDAPv2).
>
>I never got the rationale of RFC 2559 going into LDAP details
>anyway.  It's so closely tied to LDAPv2 RFCs that it's definitely
>historic if LDAPv2 is moved to historic.

Yes.


>RFC 2589, "Extensions for Dynamic Directory Services" refers to
>LDAPv3.
>
>Did you mean RFC 2587, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
>LDAPv2 Schema"?

Yes, a typo in my mail message.