Re: NAMEd syntaxes in draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-00

[Kathy Dally <kdally@mitre.org>]

Hi Kurt!

I'm a bit confused since adding the NAME was your idea.

In any case, I have no problem taking it out again.

Thanks,
Kathy Dally


"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> 
> This I-D extends LDAPv3 to support NAMEd LDAPsyntaxes.  At
> first glance, I believe this would cause significant
> interoperability problems.  Are there good reasons why support
> of NAMEd LDAPsyntaxes should not be viewed as a "new" feature?
> 
> Kurt