[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: implementation quiz: ;binary



"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> 
> Please provide a separate response for each application of
> interest.  There is no need to respond if you have not
> implemented ;binary transfer of attribute types.  This is
> only a partial quiz aimed at getting a general idea of the
> level of interoperability.
> 
> Implementor: Innosoft
> Application: Innosoft Distributed Directory Server 4.x
> Application Class: [ ] client, [x] server
> 
> Have you implemented ;binary transfer of attributes?

Yes

> Is this support specific to particular syntaxes and/or attributes?
> If so, which syntaxes and attributes?

Yes, for the certificates and revocation lists. 

> Do you support non-;binary transfer for any syntax and/or
> attribute which you support ;binary transfer for?

No.

> Does your application ensure values it sends using ;binary are
> restricted to a valid BER encoding of the attribute's syntax?

No, it sends values which have been supplied by the client in earlier
Add or Modify calls.

> Does your application treat non-BER encoded values received
> using ;binary as an error?  If so, what error?

No, the server does not enforce BER.

> Does your application treat BER encoding of values of incorrect
> using ;binary as an error?  If so, what error?

I do not understand what is meant by "of values of incorrect using ;binary".

> Does your application expect values to be encoded using a
> subset of BER?  If so, which subset?

No.

Mark Wahl
Sun Microsystems Inc.