[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: quick URL implementation report quiz

For OpenLDAP 2.0 (or current release):
At 07:26 AM 3/29/01 -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>(the URL are examples, not test cases)
>
>Does your implementation support IPv6 literal addresses?
>        ldap://[2222::1]

Yes.


>Does your implementation support not processing an URL
>with an unrecognized critical extension?

A better example:
        ldap:///????!foobar

Yes.


>In particular, when returned by a server in a referral
>or search continuation?

Yes.


>Does your implementation support the bindname extension?
>        ldap:///??sub??bindname=cn=Bar%2co=Foo

No.