[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: DN "published table" opinion
Kurt-
As I read this, I see what you are opposing, but what are you
proposing in its place?
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
[mailto:owner-ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Kurt D. Zeilenga
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:12 PM
To: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: DN "published table" opinion
The DN string representation [RFC2253] is used in LDAP to
transfer a DN [X.501] between two protocol peers. The
format must unambiguously represent a DN.
Numeric OIDs provide unambiguous naming. Attribute type names
do not. The published table mechanism is designed to allow
use of common attribute type names in a manner which eliminates
the ambiguity.
I believe adding a statement allowing alternative tables
would add ambiguity as to which table was in use which
cannot be resolved with adding "new features". I hence
oppose adding such a statement.
Kurt