[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RFC 2253 - questions

To: Christopher Oliva <Chris.Oliva@entrust.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 2253 - questions
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:55:59 -0800
Cc: "'ldapbis'" <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <A0E1DEC54ED42F4884DD9EEA00ACE37103E8ED@sottmxs08.entrust.c om>

At 11:48 AM 2/23/01 -0500, Christopher Oliva wrote:
>1) what's the latest on the "published table" of attribute names? The last suggestion was that a clause would be added to allow deployments to specify attribute names other than the 9 listed in the spec. 

That's the latest.  I have some additional thoughts on this issue
and will post shortly.

>2) can a statement be added about whether attribute names must be upper or lower case? Some people are reading the spec and coming to the conclusion that the attribute names must be in upper case.

I have suggested adding a sentence indicating the attribute
type names are case insensitive.  As there was no objection,
such will appear in the next revision of the I-D.

Prev by Date: RFC 2253 - questions
Next by Date: DN "published table" opinion
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread