[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RFC 1959 to Historic? (revised)



> Obviously not.  Guess one just has to live with a bit of confusion
> caused by having both listed on
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/categories/rfc-proposed.html.

It would seem reasonable to ask the RFC Editor to have this page be
redefined as "Proposed but not Obsoleted", which I imagine is the intent.

 - RL "Bob"