Re: RFC 1959 to Historic?

[Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>]

No, the LDAP URL "feature" is still a proposed standard. How it's
expressed is via 2255 (not 2256). The two RFCs are already linked in the
index by the "Obsoleted by" and "Obsoletes" cross-references. That's
sufficient.

	Tony Hansen
	tony@att.com

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> 
> In a review of old LDAP RFCs, I noted that "An LDAP URL Format"
> (RFC1959) and "The LDAP URL Format" are both currently listed
> as Proposed Standards.   As there should not be two specifications
> of the "ldap" URL scheme and clearly RFC2256 supercedes RFC1959,
> I believe it appropriate to recommend to the IESG that RFC1959 be
> moved to historic status.  Is there any reason why such a
> recommendation should not be made?
> 
> Kurt