[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary

To: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:29:40 -0800
Cc: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>, Jim Sermersheim <JIMSE@novell.com>, mcs@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20010124175515.00ada040@router.boolean.net>
References: <6B33416BC4BBD411BCA6009027D0D18CDAFC78@aspams01.ca.com>

I withdrawn this issue.  I had reviewed the suggestion in an
incorrect context.

I have no objection to Jim's last suggestion.  I also agree
with Steven in regards to "binary" vs "BER".

References:
- RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
  - From: "Ramsay, Ron" <Ron.Ramsay@ca.com>
- RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
Next by Date: RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread