[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary

To: <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
Subject: RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:50:03 -0800
Cc: <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <000a01c08412$e81c9940$b05508cb@osmium.adacel.com.au>
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010119191358.00acaec0@router.boolean.net>

At 12:30 PM 1/22/01 +1100, Steven Legg wrote:
>Isn't the first step to decide if there is consensus on making this
>idea of a per-syntax default encoding overt in the revised LDAP
>specifications ?

My point was only that, IMO, some clarification as to which
interpretations is correct is needed.  This, of course, is a
debatable point.  I didn't intend to offer an opinion as to
which interpretation I favor nor any specific suggestion for
how to clarify the specification.  I think we need further
discussion on the issue before any consensus can be drawn.

References:
- RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
  - From: "Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>

Prev by Date: RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
Next by Date: RE: binary syntax suggestion (Was: AttributeTypeValue and binary)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread