[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
Jim,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Jim Sermersheim
> Sent: Saturday, 20 January 2001 13:10
> To: steven.legg@adacel.com.au; Chris.Oliva@entrust.com;
> Thomas.Salter@unisys.com
> Cc: ietf-else@OpenLDAP.org; ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: RE: AttributeTypeValue and binary
>
>
> Steven,
>
> I like the way you've presented a modle of the different
> encodings here. I didn't understand one thing though. You
> claim that the DIT Content Rule Description has a BER
> encoding, but no SSER encoding. Looking at 2252:6.11 makes me
> think just the opposite (there's an SSER encoding there (per
> the BNF), but no ASN.1, thus no BER). Am I mixing something up?
No, I am. I had this idea in my head that DIT Content Rule Description
was one of the syntaxes without an SSER encoding, but didn't double check.
Doh! An example of a syntax with a BER encoding but no SSER encoding
is Access Point.
Cheers,
Steven
>
> Jim
>