[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: matching for facsimileTelephoneNumber

To: "Ryan Moats" <rmoats@coreon.net>
Subject: RE: matching for facsimileTelephoneNumber
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:40:55 -0800
Cc: "Stig Venaas" <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>, <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <OAEPJLLCHIJCOBJMOMBOKENLCIAA.rmoats@coreon.com>
References: <20001221112057.C8179@sverresborg.uninett.no>

At 09:05 AM 12/21/00 -0600, Ryan Moats wrote:
>IMHO... If it isn't in X.520, then its a topic for LDAPEXT.
>(ietf-ldapext@netscape.com). No new functionality in LDAPBIS.

I note, per our charter, that all schema items which are not
required and/or described by the LDAPv3 "core" technical
specification are not within scope of the LDAPbis WG.

facsimileTelephoneNumber is described by the LDAPv3 "core"
technical specification, so it is within scope.  However,
the proposed change, IMO, would be inappropriate as it
would create, not resolve, interoperability problems.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- RE: matching for facsimileTelephoneNumber
  - From: "Ryan Moats" <rmoats@coreon.net>

References:
- matching for facsimileTelephoneNumber
  - From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
- RE: matching for facsimileTelephoneNumber
  - From: "Ryan Moats" <rmoats@coreon.net>

Prev by Date: Revised DN TS
Next by Date: RE: matching for facsimileTelephoneNumber
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread